Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Adam Neff vs Nathan Ponwith Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Neff vs Ponwith analysis and find out who is favored!
Adam Neff vs Nathan Ponwith Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Neff 0 - 0 Ponwith
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Neff has won 49.75% of points on their second serve, while Ponwith has won 50.64%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Neff, in recent form, has won 48.34% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ponwith has won 50.74%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.32% and 32.17% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Neff has saved 70.59% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ponwith has saved 55.44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Neff has won 38.89% of matches played (W/L 7/ 11), with Ponwith winning 31.37% (W/L 16/ 35) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Neff has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Ponwith has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 38/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Neff has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 6/ 8), where as Ponwith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 21.43% of matches (W/L 6/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Neff has played against opponents with an average rank of 151.56 while Ponwith has played against players with an average rank of 174.18.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Neff has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ponwith has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Neff has converted 32% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ponwith has converted 40.24% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
834
Rank
827
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
793
Rank
367
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
42% (13-18)
Career Total W/L
55% (170-137)
33% (2-4)
YTD W/L
42% (11-15)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Adam Neff vs Nathan Ponwith For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Neff VS Ponwith
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Adam Neff | Nathan Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (2/4) | 42% (11/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 38% (5/8) | 42% (25/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 44% (56/70) | 47% (260/292) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 47% (9/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.6 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 38 | 65 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.39 |
| DFs Total | 26 | 105 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:33 | 1:52:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 102.67 | 213.92 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (221/418) | 57% (1058/1842) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (157/221) | 64% (678/1058) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (98/197) | 51% (397/784) |
| BPs Won% Total | 32% (8/25) | 40% (66/164) |
| Return Pts W% | 33% (125/384) | 39% (693/1765) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 29% (2/5) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 47% (9/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (2/6) | 42% (11/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 63% (5/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 75% (12/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 25% (12/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 14% (14/2) |
Adam Neff Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Ethan Quinn
Player
Adam Neff
64%
(
67 of
105)
1st Serve %
53%
(
56 of
106)
9
Aces
13
8
Double Faults
2
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
106)
113
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yusuke Takahashi
Player
Adam Neff
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adam Neff
Player
Harrison Adams
40%
(
25 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
7
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Adam Neff
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
1
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
4
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Neff
Player
Noah Schachter
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
82)
4
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
7
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
34 of
43)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
15 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Adam Neff
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
8
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
8
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
5 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Adam Neff
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Neff
Player
Finn Murgett
48%
(
36 of
75)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Neff
Player
Jim Hendrikx
34%
(
21 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
6
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Adam Neff
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
41%
(
31 of
76)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
9
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Nathan Ponwith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Nathan Ponwith
65%
(
70 of
107)
1st Serve %
59%
(
73 of
123)
0
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
7
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
46 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
57 of
123)
118
Total Points Won
112
|
3-6 7-6(10) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Nathan Ponwith
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Collin Altamirano
57%
(
58 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
4
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
1
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
48%
(
48 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Harsh Parikh
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Nathan Ponwith
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Aidan Mchugh
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Maxwell Benson
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Nathan Ponwith
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Nathan Ponwith
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Nathan Ponwith
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
9
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Neff Vs Ponwith Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Neff are available here and Ponwith photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Nathan Ponwith
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
